Confusion over the land of the former Flotim Kimpraswil Office, the heirs question the appeal and cassation documents

Confusion over the land of the former Flotim Kimpraswil Office, the heirs question the appeal and cassation documents

REINHA.com – The land dispute over the former Kimpraswil Flotim office is being discussed again after information circulated about the summons of the East Flores Regional Government (Pemda) by the Indonesian National Human Rights Commission (Komnas Ham) and the heirs of Aloysius Boki Labina to a letter to the Chairman of the Larantuka District Court (PN) regarding documents for submitting appeals and cassation.

This was confirmed by the heirs of Maks Labina who were met by the media at his residence, Waihali sub-district, Larantuka sub-district (Monday, 22/9/2025).

“The matter of summoning the East Timor Regional Government by Komnas Ham RI is correct and the schedule for tomorrow (Tuesday, 23/9/2025) is that the East Flotim Regional Government will meet with Komnas Ham RI in Jakarta,” said Maks Labina.

Regarding the information request letter number 08/MLB/IX/2025 to the chairman of the Larantuka District Court, the family’s power of attorney has been handed over and received directly by the Registrar of the Larantuka District Court.

“We hope that the Larantuka District Court will be serious in responding to the letter of request for information that the heirs have submitted through this letter. Because of the documents referred to in our letter, since the decision was questioned by the heirs, our party has requested them from the Larantuka District Court, but they have never been handed over to the heirs. For this reason, in this letter, the heirs have also sent copies to several State High Institutions, such as to the Indonesian Ombudsman, the Indonesian Human Rights Commission, the Indonesian Supreme Court Supervisory Agency, and the Chairman of the NTT High Court in Kupang. “This is intended by the heirs to ensure that every State institution that receives this copy can directly monitor aspects of public information disclosure in the Larantuka District Court so that if there is a complaint by the heirs to the institution concerned, this information will no longer be something new,” explained Maks Labina.

“All efforts will be made by the heirs as a form of seriousness in resolving the land dispute over the former Kimpraswil Flotim office which has been going on for almost 17 years,” emphasized Maks Labina.

According to Maks Labina, this request for information is in accordance with the provisions of the regulations governing public information as required by law, including Law number 14 of 2008 concerning public information and Government Regulation number 41 concerning guidelines for the implementation of Law Number 14, as well as within the Court there is a decree from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court number 2-144/KMA/SK/VIII/2022 concerning public information service standards in the Courts as well as Information Commission Regulation No. 1 of 2021 concerning service standards. public information.

“So regarding this request, it is hoped that the Larantuka District Court will no longer avoid it for reasons that are outside of the law,” said Max Labina.

“If there are documents, why haven’t they been given to the heirs? Moreover, this is not a state secret document and the document requested is also a notification document in the form of a Relass whose decision has been inkracht because it is legally obligatory for the Larantuka District Court to give it to the heirs,” said Maks Labina.

Regarding the documents requested in this letter, Maks Labina explained, there is a release notifying the statement of the Appeal to the plaintiff/respondent to the Appeal, a release to hand over the Memorandum of Appeal to the plaintiff/respondent to the Appeal, a release to hand over the Contra Memorandum of Appeal, a release notifying the reading of the case, a release notifying the decision of the Appeal. And in the cassation document there is a release notifying the cassation statement to the cassation respondent, a release handing over the cassation memory to the cassation respondent, a release giving the counter cassation memorandum, a release notifying the cassation decision and a special power of attorney to the Larantuka District Court and to the High Court (Appeals) as well as a special power of attorney to the cassation.

“Of course, as heirs, we are still waiting for a positive response from the Larantuka District Court regarding this official request. If this request is not responded to by the Larantuka District Court, then the family of the ahki heirs will take complaints to high institutions in this country to express the poor information services at the Larantuka District Court in fulfilling regulatory demands regarding public information disclosure,” concluded Maks Labina.

Regarding the letter of application from the heirs of Aloysius Boki Labina. The Larantuka District Court, confirmed by the media through the Larantuka District Court clerk, Sipri Berplay, stated that they were waiting for the disposition of the chairman of the Larantuka District Court.**(BM)

# Confusion over the land of the former Flotim Kimpraswil Office, the heirs question the appeal and cassation documents